|
| |
 |
 |
 |
| To increase the value of all our concerned products by considering the function of individual items and the benefit of this function and balancing this against the costs incurred in delivering it. |
| |
To increase the value or decrease the cost. |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
| Cost comparison on different laminate materials: |
| Laminate |
Cost Comparison |
| FR-4 |
|
| CEM-3 |
 |
| CEM-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
| Cost comparison on different Surface Finishes: |
| Surface Finish |
Cost Comparison |
| Plated Gold |
|
| ENIG |
|
| Lead Free HASL |
|
| OSP |
 |
| HASL |
 |
| Immersion Silver |
 |
| Bare Copper |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
| Priority for choosing a finish: |
| Scope |
Factor |
| Cost |
VA/VE |
| End customer demand |
| Environmental |
RoHS/ REACH |
| Design skill sets |
Components used |
| Assembly method |
| Ease of Assembly |
| Application |
Environment |
| Durability |
| Shelf life |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
| Cost comparison on different board thickness (including the cost of whole production respectively): |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|